Phil Mushnick doubles down in defending his column:
“I don’t call black men the N-word; I don’t regard young women as b——es and whores; I don’t glorify the use of assault weapons and drugs. Jay-Z, on the other hand…..Is he the only NBA owner allowed to call black men N—-ers?”
And the answer, of course, would be, “Not as long as Donald Sterling owns the Clippers.”
“The startling economic costs of obesity, often borne by the non-obese, could become the epidemic’s second-hand smoke. Only when scientists discovered that nonsmokers were developing lung cancer and other diseases from breathing smoke-filled air did policymakers get serious about fighting the habit, in particular by establishing nonsmoking zones. The costs that smoking added to Medicaid also spurred action. Now, as economists put a price tag on sky-high body mass indexes (BMIs), policymakers as well as the private sector are mobilizing to find solutions to the obesity epidemic.”
“As a result, hundreds of defendants nationwide remain in prison or on parole for crimes that might merit exoneration, a retrial or a retesting of evidence using DNA because FBI hair and fiber experts may have misidentified them as suspects. … In one Texas case, Benjamin Herbert Boyle was executed in 1997, more than a year after the Justice Department began its review. Boyle would not have been eligible for the death penalty without the FBI’s flawed work, according to a prosecutor’s memo.”
Sara Ganim, the 24-year-old Patriot News reporter who broke the story that a grand jury was investigating Penn State Assistant Football Coach Jerry Sandusky for sexual abuse allegations, has won a richly deserved 2012 Pulitzer Prize for local reporting.
Whether we like it or not, the failure of Paterno to do more than the bare minimum is a more important part of his legacy than the cute coke-bottle glasses he wore, the way he led his team onto the field in a ratty sweater, and any football game won. Football is a game. It does not affect life. The abuse of a child is an act that affects the victim for life and can lead to self-hatred and suicide. I, for one, know of no football player who committed suicide because he threw a last-minute interception or missed a game-saving tackle.
Even before Paterno’s death Sunday, the travesty of Penn State was already veering away from the countless acts of sexual abuse Sandusky allegedly committed against minors, not to mention all the indications of a cover-up by the top echelon of the university, including Paterno. Instead a new steam engine has been in motion, questioning whether Paterno had been treated fairly by the trustees when he was fired. The chorus was growing louder, forcing board of trustee members to go on a public relations blitz to The New York Times and the Philadelphia Inquirer to make their case they had done the right thing. Which they did. Artful, no, because of the way he was notified, with a phone message to call a board member. Necessary, yes.
My guess is that the death of Paterno will pump that steam engine even more. Those who loved him—and there are many thousands, and they have every right to love him—will push him more and more into the sanctity of the martyred because of his death.
“When I think back on Joe Paterno’s legacy, the events of the last two months won’t even cross my mind.”
Franco Harris, last week:
“I find it hard to believe that on Nov. 9th, that all 32 board members wanted Joe Paterno fired,” Harris said. “Hopefully, someone will come forward and admit they didn’t want Joe Paterno fired. This wasn’t a football problem. If it had been a football issue, believe me, Joe Paterno would have handled this.
“The present leadership thinks it’s right what happened and how this was handled. And we all know it was wrong. And this comes from our current leadership. They’re hoping everything goes on as normal. All I want is the truth.
“I think we deserve it.”
Hopefully, somebody supplied him with a copy of this article out of the New York Times today:
The board, scrambling to address the child sexual abuse scandal involving the university and its football program, had already decided to remove Graham B. Spanier as president. Then, many of those present recalled this week, the tension in the room mounted. Joe Paterno’s future was next up. Surma announced that an agreement appeared to have been reached to fire Paterno, too — the trustees having determined that he had failed to take adequate action when he was told that one of his longtime assistants had been seen molesting a 10-year-old boy in Paterno’s football facility.
Surma, those present recalled, surveyed the other trustees — there are 32 — for their opinions and emotions before asking one last question: “Does anyone have any objections? If you have an objection, we’re open to it.”
No one in the room spoke. There was silence from the phone speakers. Paterno’s 46-year tenure as head coach of one of the country’s storied college football programs was over, and the gravity of the action began to sink in.
Or more importantly (emphasis mine):
“To me, it wasn’t about guilt or innocence in a legal sense,” the trustee Kenneth C. Frazier, the chief executive at Merck, said of Paterno’s decision not to go to police. “It was about these norms of society that I’m talking about: that every adult has a responsibility for every other child in our community. And that we have a responsibility not to do the minimum, the legal requirement. We have a responsibility for ensuring that we can take every effort that’s within our power not only to prevent further harm to that child, but to every other child.”
Where [Jim] Boeheim went wrong — and by “wrong” I mean, “Where Boeheim should be fired” — is what he told reporters the next day, including this comment to the bad enough The Post-Standard of Syracuse: ”The Penn State thing came out, and the kid behind this is trying to get money.”
That’s enough right there. Had Boeheim ended the interview at that moment, I’d beg for his firing today — especially now that the school itself has decided there’s an awful lot of smoke around Bernie Fine, so much so that the school thinks maybe, just maybe, there’s some fire there as well. Otherwise, why was Bernie Fine fired on Sunday, before he’s even been charged by police? Perhaps because the earlier developments Sunday, including a taped phone call involving his own wife, are so damning?
But anyway, that comment alone is enough to get Boeheim fired. But then he went farther. He also said, on Nov. 18 to the The Post-Standard of Syracuse: “If [the alleged victim] gets this, he’s going to sue the university and Bernie. What do you think is going to happen at Penn State? You know how much money is going to be involved in civil suits? I’d say about $50 million. That’s what this is about. Money.”
Boeheim also called the first two alleged victims “liars.”
“There is always something a little nauseating in large spectacles of conspicuous public piety, but watching everyone on the field take a knee before the Penn State-Nebraska game, and listening to the commentary about how devoutly everybody was praying for the victims at Penn State, was enough to get me reaching for a bucket and a Bible all at once. It was as though the players and coaches had devised some sort of new training regimen to get past the awful reality of what had happened. Prayer as a new form of two-a-days. Jesus is my strength coach. Contrition in the context of a football game seemed almost obscene in its obvious vanity.”
Okay, this is pretty bad, even worse than Fox’s usual non-scientific, self-selection “polls.”
- “Hmm, yes I’d like my child to find a fulfilling career (how?) in a protest movement that is barely two months old.”
- How are “other” and “neither” two distinct categories? Do some parents want their children to become some sort of protesting executive? Do they want their kids to become daytraders in Zuccotti park?
- “Would you rather your child grow up to be an astronaut or a seahorse?”
Since this doesn’t come with their usual “non-scientific” disclaimer, I assume they paid actual money to ask people these questions, which shows how badly they’re grasping at straws to keep the narrative going. The beauty of this poll from a propaganda standpoint is that it was on screen for maybe five seconds before Shepard Smith and Co. moved on to questions about who actually started the violence at Occupy Oakland, as if this was ever in dispute. While anybody who is paying attention would immediately notice how asinine the poll is, for the passive Fox viewer, this reinforces the idea that this is a black and white, 50/50 struggle, further narrowing the frame of the discussion, backing it up with a nice, easily digestible graphic.
I AM THE 8 PERCENT
(Also: Seahorse.)
“They have made nothing. They have contributed nothing to the country. They made deals for themselves. And once they got in trouble, they turned to firefighters and nurses and waitresses and small business people to bail them out. … So is it legit? You better believe it’s legit. Is it for real? Is there a tradition in this country of protests and citizen outrage leading to real changes, whether it’s abolition, whether it’s prohibition, whether it’s civil rights, whether it’s anti-war? There sure is.”
PROTECT IP Act would cost taxpayers $47 million, private sector much more:
The Congressional Budget Office has released a new estimate of the cost of the PROTECT IP Act, the controversial legislation to force private ISPs, search engines, and other parties to censor websites accused of facilitating copyright infringement. Based on personnel estimates supplied by the Obama administration, the CBO estimates that the enforcement activities of PROTECT IP will cost taxpayers about $10 million per year.
***
An extra $10 million in spending is a drop in the bucket in a federal budget that now exceeds $3 trillion. But the estimate comes with two important caveats. First, the personnel requirements were estimated by the Obama administration, which may have an incentive to downplay the bill’s costs in order to speed its passage. So it’s possible that the government would devote significantly more resources to enforcement once the legislation was enacted.
The bigger concern is that the estimate doesn’t include potential costs to the private sector. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires the CBO to estimate whether proposed legislation will cost the private sector more than $142 million. The CBO says it can’t do that in this case because of “uncertainty about how often and against whom the Department of Justice or copyright holders would use the authority” provided by the legislation.
We’ve never had the kind of large-scale Internet censorship infrastructure mandated by the PROTECT IP Act, so it’s hard to predict how much it would cost private ISPs, search engines, and credit card networks to comply. But maintaining, updating, and enforcing blacklists could be expensive, and these costs would be multiplied across hundreds, if not thousands, of private firms.
