Watch An Argument Against Cuts to Medicare and Social Security on PBS. See more from PBS NewsHour.

A discussion of the role of “so-called entitlements” in the “Fiscal Cliff” debate:

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, first of all, why shouldn’t Social Security and Medicare be part of the entire group of government spending programs that are being looked at to get — to deal with the deficits?

MAX RICHTMAN: Well, before I answer that, I was very interested in the way you characterized these programs as entitlements, so-called, you said, entitlements.

And we think that a better term would be earned benefits.

You know, I counted the letters in the word entitlement. There are 11 letters. But often people refer to entitlement as a four-letter word. And it’s a derogatory, derisive characterization.

These are earned benefits. People pay for them while they’re working, Social Security, Part A Medicare, the hospital part, 25 percent of the premium for Part B. So they’re — I wish we would switch from entitlements to earned benefits, first of all.

Notes

  1. dizzydezzi reblogged this from jadedskeptic
  2. scollinsunapologetic reblogged this from dynastylnoire
  3. reallivewired reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  4. merlocon reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  5. dynastylnoire reblogged this from hairtrending
  6. hairtrending reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  7. zenodotus5 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    Absolutely perfect.
  8. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from excitablehonky
  9. rb-flatface reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  10. leftistnaija reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  11. oneluv918 reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  12. pavlovsstepson reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  13. reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from excitablehonky
  14. excitablehonky posted this